With carbohydrate calories making up on average 65% of most Americans total daily caloric intake, any modification in the variety and volume of carbohydrate intake might have a profound impact on long-term health and weight management. Numerous popular diets have targeted the lowly carbohydrate, leading the charge in what will surely be remembered as the “low carb” diet era.
However, without a deeper understanding of the role carbohydrates play in normal physiology, in gut physiology, in the prevention of heart disease and cancer, and more globally, the role they play in long-term health promotion—cutting carbs may or may not be a desirable goal depending on which carbs are being eliminated. This series will attempt to demystify and unravel the popular notions of carbohydrate intake as well as the glycemic index and glycemic load and add insight into the relationship between carbohydrate intake and health.
A basic presentation of carbohydrate terminology will be presented first—which is an admittedly dry subject—but will naturally lead into some current controversies related to carbohydrate intake. The basic science and vocabulary of carbohydrates is critical to understanding not just the glycemic index and glycemic load, but numerous other aspects of carbohydrate physiology. Ultimately, the distillation of the following sections is the impact carbohydrates may have on weight management, health, and longevity.
The glycemic index and glycemic load are measures of glucose absorption and the concomitant blood glucose level resulting. In very basic terms, glucose is the fundamental building block of most carbohydrate molecules. The basic sugars are broken down into
monosaccharides
1. Glucose (glue-kose) Grape sugar
2. Fructose (frook-tose) Fruit sugar
3. Galactose (Galak-tose) Component of Milk Sugar
And disaccharides . . .
4. Sucrose (Sue-krose) Table sugar
5. Lactose (Lak-tose) Milk sugar
6. Maltose (Mall-tose) Malt sugar
The glycemic index asks the question: if I eat a food containing carbohydrates, how will it impact my blood sugar over the next two to three hours? Thus taking that approach, the disaccharides cannot be absorbed until broken down in the gut to allow the glucose (and fructose and galactose) to travel through the intestinal mucsoa into the blood.
Honey is primarily fructose and since we don't measure blood fructose levels, the glycemic index of honey is low. Again, when blood sugar is measured, we measure glucose, not fructose. Honey is gram for gram sweeter than table sugar, but the resulting glycemic index is lower. Confused? Don't be, fructose triggers those papillary taste buds with waves of sweetness and the resulting blood glucose elevation is minimal. Fructose is absorbed from the intestine and taken up by cells, with some being metabolized for the energy needs of cells, and some fructose is altered (metabolized) in reverse to produce glucose and enter the blood stream. Thus fructose containing foods have a low glycemic index. Numerous foods are flavored with fructose and high fructose corn syrup (HFCS). It hardly seems fair, but Cola drinks usually have a lower glycemic index than certain vegetables because they're sweetened with HFCS. More tomorrow.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(45)
-
▼
January
(19)
- Omega-3's and Death
- Omega-3 Zeitgeist
- Omega-3's: Do they prevent heart disease?
- Omega Chemistry?
- Omega Madness
- Obesity and Legal Matters
- The Wisdom of a Serving Size
- Micro and Macroscopic Fat
- Surgical Fat: The Tummy Tuck
- Trans Fatty Acid: Unhealthy or Undebated (4) Final...
- Trans Fatty Acids: Unhealthy or Undebated 3
- Trans Fatty acids: Unhealthy or Undebated 2
- Trans Fatty Acids: Unhealthy or Undebated
- Glycemic Index 3
- Glycemic Index 2
- The Glycemic Index
- FDA News
- Dieting: Success and Failure (Part 5, Final)
- Dieting: Success and Failure (Part 4)
-
▼
January
(19)
A Point of View
Modern Western society is awash in a sea of food affluence. For many of us, from the moment we arise in the morning to the time we fall asleep at night, the one rhythmic pattern occurring daily with anticipated consistency is food intake—and in many cases very high quality food intake. Even the smallest of excess calories consumed daily translates over time to excess energy being stored as fat in adipose tissue.
______________________________________
Overeating has become the symptom of a cultural disease associated with conditioned food intake, not a mystical physiologic process involving genes gone wild. From one diet manual to the next, the book offerings to navigate this mess are fancied up versions of the same old thing, eventually returning the dieter to a conditioned system of eating behavior. The contention of this blog, is it's time to get off the merry-go-round of dieting and learn the ABC's of basic nutritional science. Teach your children what they need to know to navigate the gauntlet of foods in the 21st century. We encourage any experts in the field to contribute.

2 comments:
Shows why people cannot really follow the much-hypd GI diet without the help of simplified cheat sheets!
Hey! Thanks for the link, and for the awesome blog! Your design is gorgeous... did you do it yourself? It looks very professional. I wish my site looked like yours!
april
Post a Comment